<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 107 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334089</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified the services provided by the respondent company, involving synthesizing chemical compounds, conducting tests, and providing analytical reports, under Technical Testing and Analysis (TTA) service instead of Scientific and Technical Consultancy (STC) service. The decision was based on the nature of work carried out, emphasizing the technical testing and analysis aspect over consultancy services, in line with the definition provided in the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 107 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334089</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified the services provided by the respondent company, involving synthesizing chemical compounds, conducting tests, and providing analytical reports, under Technical Testing and Analysis (TTA) service instead of Scientific and Technical Consultancy (STC) service. The decision was based on the nature of work carried out, emphasizing the technical testing and analysis aspect over consultancy services, in line with the definition provided in the Finance Act, 1994.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>