<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 106 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334088</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the service tax assessee, granting the refund of the disallowed amount for various disputed input services under Renting of Immovable Property Services and Information Technology Software Services. The Tribunal held that services like Chartered Accountant&#039;s Services, Courier Services, Commercial Training or Coaching Centre&#039;s Services, Cleaning Services, Telecommunication Services, and Works Contract Services were essential for the business operations, making them eligible for Cenvat credit refund. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the consideration of relevant case laws and previous orders, ultimately ruling in favor of the Appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 106 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334088</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the service tax assessee, granting the refund of the disallowed amount for various disputed input services under Renting of Immovable Property Services and Information Technology Software Services. The Tribunal held that services like Chartered Accountant&#039;s Services, Courier Services, Commercial Training or Coaching Centre&#039;s Services, Cleaning Services, Telecommunication Services, and Works Contract Services were essential for the business operations, making them eligible for Cenvat credit refund. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was based on the consideration of relevant case laws and previous orders, ultimately ruling in favor of the Appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>