<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 96 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334078</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the revenue department in a case concerning the classification of goods under the Central Excise Rules, excisability of manufactured goods, marketability of goods, and the manufacturing process. The tribunal held that the goods in question, despite the fabrication process involved, were deemed excisable as they possessed commercial identity and were subject to duty as per legal precedents. The decision set aside the previous order and allowed the appeal filed by the revenue department, emphasizing the importance of market recognition and commercial viability in determining duty liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 96 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334078</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Hyderabad ruled in favor of the revenue department in a case concerning the classification of goods under the Central Excise Rules, excisability of manufactured goods, marketability of goods, and the manufacturing process. The tribunal held that the goods in question, despite the fabrication process involved, were deemed excisable as they possessed commercial identity and were subject to duty as per legal precedents. The decision set aside the previous order and allowed the appeal filed by the revenue department, emphasizing the importance of market recognition and commercial viability in determining duty liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>