<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 92 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the original Adjudicating Authority for further verification of details related to both inward and outward transportation. The appellant&#039;s claim for Cenvat credit on service tax paid on freight for outward transportation was partially allowed, with the necessity to verify the disallowed amount related to service tax on inward transportation of raw materials. The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant&#039;s documents supporting the eligibility of Cenvat credit for inward transportation but directed verification before granting credit. Additionally, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s claim for Cenvat credit on outward transportation based on the terms of the purchase order, ordering further verification for consistency across various orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 13:43:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 92 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the original Adjudicating Authority for further verification of details related to both inward and outward transportation. The appellant&#039;s claim for Cenvat credit on service tax paid on freight for outward transportation was partially allowed, with the necessity to verify the disallowed amount related to service tax on inward transportation of raw materials. The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant&#039;s documents supporting the eligibility of Cenvat credit for inward transportation but directed verification before granting credit. Additionally, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant&#039;s claim for Cenvat credit on outward transportation based on the terms of the purchase order, ordering further verification for consistency across various orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>