<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 583 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187705</link>
    <description>A notification issued under the Karnataka Government Parks (Preservation) Act, 1975 reduced the area earlier notified as part of Cubbon Park to facilitate specified constructions. The Court noted the Act&#039;s preservation purpose and expressed reservations about whether the notified park area could lawfully be diminished by invoking Section 3 of the Act or Section 21 of the General Clauses Act. However, it declined to disturb the High Court&#039;s order and expressly refrained from finally deciding the legality of the notification. The question whether the reduction of the notified park area was valid was left open, and no conclusive ruling on the merits of the challenge was given.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 12:55:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 583 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187705</link>
      <description>A notification issued under the Karnataka Government Parks (Preservation) Act, 1975 reduced the area earlier notified as part of Cubbon Park to facilitate specified constructions. The Court noted the Act&#039;s preservation purpose and expressed reservations about whether the notified park area could lawfully be diminished by invoking Section 3 of the Act or Section 21 of the General Clauses Act. However, it declined to disturb the High Court&#039;s order and expressly refrained from finally deciding the legality of the notification. The question whether the reduction of the notified park area was valid was left open, and no conclusive ruling on the merits of the challenge was given.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>