<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (2) TMI 411 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187700</link>
    <description>Povidone Iodine was treated as an adduct or complex of polyvinylpyrrolidone and iodine, not as a separate chemically defined organic compound under Chapter 29. Because polyvinylpyrrolidone is a polymer with variable molecular weight and the iodine content was present in a range rather than a fixed proportion, the product did not satisfy the tariff concept of a single defined compound. The therapeutic use of the product did not alter its tariff classification, and a Chapter 29 exemption could not be claimed unless the goods first fell within that chapter. The result was that the product remained outside Chapter 29 and the notification benefit was unavailable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 11:34:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (2) TMI 411 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187700</link>
      <description>Povidone Iodine was treated as an adduct or complex of polyvinylpyrrolidone and iodine, not as a separate chemically defined organic compound under Chapter 29. Because polyvinylpyrrolidone is a polymer with variable molecular weight and the iodine content was present in a range rather than a fixed proportion, the product did not satisfy the tariff concept of a single defined compound. The therapeutic use of the product did not alter its tariff classification, and a Chapter 29 exemption could not be claimed unless the goods first fell within that chapter. The result was that the product remained outside Chapter 29 and the notification benefit was unavailable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>