https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187696 The District Magistrate's order under Section 14 of the Securitisation Act was challenged. The court held that the District Magistrate overstepped jurisdiction by making unauthorized remarks in the order. The order was annulled, and the case was remitted to the District Magistrate for a lawful determination. The petitioner's application was reinstated, instructing the District Magistrate to aid in transferring possession to the petitioner. The petition succeeded without costs. en-us Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Nov 2016 11:01:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187696 The District Magistrate's order under Section 14 of the Securitisation Act was challenged. The court held that the District Magistrate overstepped jurisdiction by making unauthorized remarks in the order. The order was annulled, and the case was remitted to the District Magistrate for a lawful determination. The petitioner's application was reinstated, instructing the District Magistrate to aid in transferring possession to the petitioner. The petition succeeded without costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187696