https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334073 The court directed respondent No.2 to dispose of the petitioner's application for the seized perishable cosmetic goods promptly and resolve the show cause notice within four weeks to prevent further delays and potential losses. The judgment emphasized the importance of timely action in addressing issues such as detention of goods, assessed value discrepancies, Intellectual Property Rights violations, and the necessity of prompt disposal of goods to avoid perishing. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jan 2017 14:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334073 The court directed respondent No.2 to dispose of the petitioner's application for the seized perishable cosmetic goods promptly and resolve the show cause notice within four weeks to prevent further delays and potential losses. The judgment emphasized the importance of timely action in addressing issues such as detention of goods, assessed value discrepancies, Intellectual Property Rights violations, and the necessity of prompt disposal of goods to avoid perishing. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334073