<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 90 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334072</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld penalties of Rs. 30.00 Lakhs and Rs. 50.00 Lakhs imposed on two firm proprietors for fraudulent drawback claims, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal for enhancement. The penalties, 44% to 50% of undue benefits, were deemed appropriate without adequate grounds for increase. The appellants&#039; financial challenges and lack of prior deposits were considered, leading to dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal on September 12, 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2016 10:50:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 90 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334072</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld penalties of Rs. 30.00 Lakhs and Rs. 50.00 Lakhs imposed on two firm proprietors for fraudulent drawback claims, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal for enhancement. The penalties, 44% to 50% of undue benefits, were deemed appropriate without adequate grounds for increase. The appellants&#039; financial challenges and lack of prior deposits were considered, leading to dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal on September 12, 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>