https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334061 The court rejected the application seeking to recall the order dated 27-03-2013 in Company Application No.919/2008. It found no grounds to do so, emphasizing the discretionary nature of pursuing legal matters. The court highlighted the role of the Company Law Board in addressing delays or issues related to the application and clarified that the respondents could proceed before the Board with necessary applications regarding oppression and mismanagement without blanket permission. en-us Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Nov 2016 09:34:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334061 The court rejected the application seeking to recall the order dated 27-03-2013 in Company Application No.919/2008. It found no grounds to do so, emphasizing the discretionary nature of pursuing legal matters. The court highlighted the role of the Company Law Board in addressing delays or issues related to the application and clarified that the respondents could proceed before the Board with necessary applications regarding oppression and mismanagement without blanket permission. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334061