https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187689 The tribunal classified the product "Povidone Iodine IP/USP" under chapter 39, rejecting the appellant's classification under chapter 29. The tribunal found the demand for differential duty for the period 01-05-1995 to 31-10-1997 time-barred, as the appellant had followed approved classification lists and there was no evidence of misstatement. The show cause notice issued on 12-01-1999 was deemed time-barred, leading to the tribunal setting aside the impugned order based on the limitation issue. Other submissions were not addressed. en-us Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Nov 2016 21:48:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187689 The tribunal classified the product "Povidone Iodine IP/USP" under chapter 39, rejecting the appellant's classification under chapter 29. The tribunal found the demand for differential duty for the period 01-05-1995 to 31-10-1997 time-barred, as the appellant had followed approved classification lists and there was no evidence of misstatement. The show cause notice issued on 12-01-1999 was deemed time-barred, leading to the tribunal setting aside the impugned order based on the limitation issue. Other submissions were not addressed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 07 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187689