<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 67 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334049</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, setting aside the disallowance made by the AO and the CIT(A). The Tribunal concluded that the exemption claimed by the assessee could not be disallowed as the assessee had already withdrawn the exemption in the subsequent year, thereby avoiding double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 18:00:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 67 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334049</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the assessee, setting aside the disallowance made by the AO and the CIT(A). The Tribunal concluded that the exemption claimed by the assessee could not be disallowed as the assessee had already withdrawn the exemption in the subsequent year, thereby avoiding double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>