https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334048 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals on multiple grounds, directing the AO to delete various disallowances and upholding the CIT(A)'s decision on brand building expenses. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on issues such as depreciation on courseware, disallowance of expenses on the Lucknow School Project, ESOP charges, and provision for rebate. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete additions under Section 40(a)(ia) for hire charges, Section 14A for exempt income, and Section 68 for unexplained cash receipts. en-us Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Nov 2016 18:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334048 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeals on multiple grounds, directing the AO to delete various disallowances and upholding the CIT(A)'s decision on brand building expenses. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on issues such as depreciation on courseware, disallowance of expenses on the Lucknow School Project, ESOP charges, and provision for rebate. Additionally, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete additions under Section 40(a)(ia) for hire charges, Section 14A for exempt income, and Section 68 for unexplained cash receipts. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334048