<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 55 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334037</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a government undertaking registered under Service Tax as a Goods Transport Agency, in a case concerning the renting out of premises in a shopping complex. The appellant claimed exemption under Notification No. 6/2005-ST for amounts received, which fell within the exemption limit of Rs. 10,00,000. The Tribunal disagreed with the authorities&#039; interpretation of the Service Tax liability, emphasizing that the appellant&#039;s total receipts did not exceed the exemption threshold. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order demanding Service Tax, interest, and penalties, granting the appellant the benefit of the exemption under the notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 55 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334037</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a government undertaking registered under Service Tax as a Goods Transport Agency, in a case concerning the renting out of premises in a shopping complex. The appellant claimed exemption under Notification No. 6/2005-ST for amounts received, which fell within the exemption limit of Rs. 10,00,000. The Tribunal disagreed with the authorities&#039; interpretation of the Service Tax liability, emphasizing that the appellant&#039;s total receipts did not exceed the exemption threshold. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order demanding Service Tax, interest, and penalties, granting the appellant the benefit of the exemption under the notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>