https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334033 The appeal challenged the demand for 10% payment on the value of Iron Ore Fines and Coal Fines cleared by the manufacturer under Rule 6(3)(b) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the fines emerging during the manufacturing process of Sponge Iron were not excisable products. As such, clearing them without duty payment did not trigger the 10% payment requirement. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside based on legal precedents and established principles. en-us Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Nov 2016 15:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334033 The appeal challenged the demand for 10% payment on the value of Iron Ore Fines and Coal Fines cleared by the manufacturer under Rule 6(3)(b) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, holding that the fines emerging during the manufacturing process of Sponge Iron were not excisable products. As such, clearing them without duty payment did not trigger the 10% payment requirement. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside based on legal precedents and established principles. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 27 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334033