https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334024 The Tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the impugned orders demanding reversal of cenvat credit and penalties. The decision was influenced by a precedent established in a case involving Hindalco Industries Ltd., where it was held that the recipient cannot be held liable for the supplier's duty payment discrepancies. The Tribunal also found the penalties imposed on the appellant and the supplier to be unsustainable, referencing a similar case where penalties on the supplier were set aside by the Punjab and Haryana High Court. en-us Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Nov 2016 14:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334024 The Tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the impugned orders demanding reversal of cenvat credit and penalties. The decision was influenced by a precedent established in a case involving Hindalco Industries Ltd., where it was held that the recipient cannot be held liable for the supplier's duty payment discrepancies. The Tribunal also found the penalties imposed on the appellant and the supplier to be unsustainable, referencing a similar case where penalties on the supplier were set aside by the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 20 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334024