https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334022 The penalty imposed on Smt. Geetu S. Gidwani was set aside due to insufficient evidence of her active involvement in the under-valuation of goods. However, the penalty on Shri Sanjay V. Karkare was upheld as there was convincing evidence of his direct role in the clandestine removal of goods, despite his arguments to the contrary. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the penalty on Shri Sanjay V. Karkare being upheld. en-us Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jan 2017 17:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334022 The penalty imposed on Smt. Geetu S. Gidwani was set aside due to insufficient evidence of her active involvement in the under-valuation of goods. However, the penalty on Shri Sanjay V. Karkare was upheld as there was convincing evidence of his direct role in the clandestine removal of goods, despite his arguments to the contrary. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the penalty on Shri Sanjay V. Karkare being upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334022