https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334016 In anti-dumping review proceedings, the injury determination was sustained because advertising and sales promotion expenses were shown to have been included in the non-injurious price calculation, so the alleged distortion of injury margin was not established. The Tribunal also accepted that the designated authority had examined and verified the costing data of Merbok, Sri Lanka on record, and that spot verification was not always required where the material had otherwise been scrutinised. On sunset review, material injury must be assessed on contemporaneous facts during the review period, not on speculative assumptions about the future continuance or cessation of a time-bound exemption. en-us Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Apr 2017 15:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334016 In anti-dumping review proceedings, the injury determination was sustained because advertising and sales promotion expenses were shown to have been included in the non-injurious price calculation, so the alleged distortion of injury margin was not established. The Tribunal also accepted that the designated authority had examined and verified the costing data of Merbok, Sri Lanka on record, and that spot verification was not always required where the material had otherwise been scrutinised. On sunset review, material injury must be assessed on contemporaneous facts during the review period, not on speculative assumptions about the future continuance or cessation of a time-bound exemption. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334016