<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (12) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5561</link>
    <description>The Court applied its earlier precedent on analogous penalty provisions under the Wealth-tax Act and declined to reopen that ruling. It held that the prior decision remained binding, with no sufficient ground to reconsider it, and applied that authority to the relevant assessment years. On that basis, the amended enhanced penalty scale governed the period in question where the law so provided, and the issue was resolved in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (12) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5561</link>
      <description>The Court applied its earlier precedent on analogous penalty provisions under the Wealth-tax Act and declined to reopen that ruling. It held that the prior decision remained binding, with no sufficient ground to reconsider it, and applied that authority to the relevant assessment years. On that basis, the amended enhanced penalty scale governed the period in question where the law so provided, and the issue was resolved in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>