<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1487 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187671</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty of Rs. 4,04,232 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal considered the mistake in non-payment of interest as bonafide, citing precedents where penalties were deleted for similar errors due to ignorance of law. The appellant&#039;s explanation of ignorance of the amended provisions and inadvertence by the tax consultant was accepted, leading to the penalty being overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 13:15:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446437" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1487 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187671</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty of Rs. 4,04,232 imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal considered the mistake in non-payment of interest as bonafide, citing precedents where penalties were deleted for similar errors due to ignorance of law. The appellant&#039;s explanation of ignorance of the amended provisions and inadvertence by the tax consultant was accepted, leading to the penalty being overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>