<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 30 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334012</link>
    <description>Defective C-Forms that are capable of correction must be returned to the dealer so the defects can be cured before the assessment is finalised. Where the dealer has sought return of the forms and the request has been received, the assessing authority should not rely on the disputed forms to complete the assessment without giving that opportunity. The assessment must be revisited after the corrected forms, and any fresh forms produced, are considered on the relevant heads.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 12:16:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 30 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334012</link>
      <description>Defective C-Forms that are capable of correction must be returned to the dealer so the defects can be cured before the assessment is finalised. Where the dealer has sought return of the forms and the request has been received, the assessing authority should not rely on the disputed forms to complete the assessment without giving that opportunity. The assessment must be revisited after the corrected forms, and any fresh forms produced, are considered on the relevant heads.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>