https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334006 Admission of signatures on a cheque attracted the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the accused failed to rebut it by defence evidence. The complainant's oral and documentary evidence, including the cheque, promissory note, return memos and notice, supported the dishonour claim, while the plea that the cheque had been issued to a third person remained unproved. In revisional jurisdiction, concurrent findings were not to be reappreciated absent illegality, infirmity or impropriety. No ground for revisional interference was made out, and the conviction and sentence under Section 138 were upheld. en-us Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Nov 2016 10:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334006 Admission of signatures on a cheque attracted the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the accused failed to rebut it by defence evidence. The complainant's oral and documentary evidence, including the cheque, promissory note, return memos and notice, supported the dishonour claim, while the plea that the cheque had been issued to a third person remained unproved. In revisional jurisdiction, concurrent findings were not to be reappreciated absent illegality, infirmity or impropriety. No ground for revisional interference was made out, and the conviction and sentence under Section 138 were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334006