<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (1) TMI 1308 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187666</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties under section 271(1)(c) for various disallowances in the Assessment Year 2006-07. For the Assessment Year 2007-08, penalties were partly allowed, with the penalty to be levied only on the disputed income from layout formation. The Tribunal stressed the need for evidence to substantiate claims and rebut the presumption of income concealment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2016 18:37:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (1) TMI 1308 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187666</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties under section 271(1)(c) for various disallowances in the Assessment Year 2006-07. For the Assessment Year 2007-08, penalties were partly allowed, with the penalty to be levied only on the disputed income from layout formation. The Tribunal stressed the need for evidence to substantiate claims and rebut the presumption of income concealment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>