<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1131 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187668</link>
    <description>The HC held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction under section 153A of the Income Tax Act to reopen concluded assessments in the absence of incriminating material discovered during search and seizure. The court affirmed that incriminating material is a necessary precondition for invoking powers under sections 153C read with 153A. Consequently, reopening assessments without such material was not permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 16:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1131 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187668</link>
      <description>The HC held that the Assessing Officer lacked jurisdiction under section 153A of the Income Tax Act to reopen concluded assessments in the absence of incriminating material discovered during search and seizure. The court affirmed that incriminating material is a necessary precondition for invoking powers under sections 153C read with 153A. Consequently, reopening assessments without such material was not permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>