<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 23 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334005</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore held that the appellant, a bank providing financial services, was entitled to interest on a delayed refund claimed for service tax paid on credit card transactions. Relying on the Supreme Court decision in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. vs. UOI &amp;amp; Ors., the Tribunal determined that interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, accrues if the duty refund is not processed within three months from the refund application. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant interest on the delayed refund payment as per the statutory provisions and legal precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 23 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334005</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore held that the appellant, a bank providing financial services, was entitled to interest on a delayed refund claimed for service tax paid on credit card transactions. Relying on the Supreme Court decision in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. vs. UOI &amp;amp; Ors., the Tribunal determined that interest under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, accrues if the duty refund is not processed within three months from the refund application. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the appellant interest on the delayed refund payment as per the statutory provisions and legal precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>