<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 18 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334000</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s services taxable but waived penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 due to financial crisis, installment payments, and genuine intention to pay, citing Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The confirmed service tax demand and interest were upheld, penalties set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2016 18:04:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446374" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 18 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334000</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s services taxable but waived penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 due to financial crisis, installment payments, and genuine intention to pay, citing Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The confirmed service tax demand and interest were upheld, penalties set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>