<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (9) TMI 89 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187641</link>
    <description>A Hindu son&#039;s pious obligation to discharge a father&#039;s just debts continues after partition unless the debt is immoral or illegal, or payment arrangements were made at partition. Negligence in managing a commercial institution does not, without more, make the resulting liability avyavaharika; the debt therefore remains binding on the sons. An earlier adjudication cannot prove the underlying facts where the Evidence Act excludes its use for that purpose. In execution sales, the interest transferred depends on the property offered for sale and the intentions shown by the notices, proclamation, confirmation and sale certificate. Where those materials establish that the whole property was sold, partition does not protect the sons&#039; shares from execution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2016 11:59:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (9) TMI 89 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187641</link>
      <description>A Hindu son&#039;s pious obligation to discharge a father&#039;s just debts continues after partition unless the debt is immoral or illegal, or payment arrangements were made at partition. Negligence in managing a commercial institution does not, without more, make the resulting liability avyavaharika; the debt therefore remains binding on the sons. An earlier adjudication cannot prove the underlying facts where the Evidence Act excludes its use for that purpose. In execution sales, the interest transferred depends on the property offered for sale and the intentions shown by the notices, proclamation, confirmation and sale certificate. Where those materials establish that the whole property was sold, partition does not protect the sons&#039; shares from execution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>