<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (2) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5551</link>
    <description>Amounts brought to tax as a balancing charge under section 41(2) were examined for possible treatment as part of &quot;accumulated profits&quot; so as to attract deemed dividend taxation. The Bench noted conflicting authorities on whether section 41(2) creates a legal fiction confined to a limited purpose or whether an amount once treated as income operates as income for all purposes under the Act. Finding the issue difficult and of wider importance, it declined to give a final ruling and referred both questions to a larger Bench for authoritative determination. No definitive conclusion was reached on either the accumulated profits issue or the scope of the section 41(2) fiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (2) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5551</link>
      <description>Amounts brought to tax as a balancing charge under section 41(2) were examined for possible treatment as part of &quot;accumulated profits&quot; so as to attract deemed dividend taxation. The Bench noted conflicting authorities on whether section 41(2) creates a legal fiction confined to a limited purpose or whether an amount once treated as income operates as income for all purposes under the Act. Finding the issue difficult and of wider importance, it declined to give a final ruling and referred both questions to a larger Bench for authoritative determination. No definitive conclusion was reached on either the accumulated profits issue or the scope of the section 41(2) fiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>