<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1001 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333981</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the assessment order challenged under TNVAT Act and CST Act for the year 2014-15, emphasizing the importance of natural justice principles. It criticized the arbitrary treatment of the petitioner, a registered dealer, regarding the production of C-Forms and the respondent&#039;s hasty confirmation of the proposal without a personal hearing. The Court directed a redo of the assessment, stressing the necessity of a personal hearing and submission of C-Forms for fresh consideration, remanding the matter for a lawful reassessment process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2016 11:48:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446337" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1001 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333981</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the assessment order challenged under TNVAT Act and CST Act for the year 2014-15, emphasizing the importance of natural justice principles. It criticized the arbitrary treatment of the petitioner, a registered dealer, regarding the production of C-Forms and the respondent&#039;s hasty confirmation of the proposal without a personal hearing. The Court directed a redo of the assessment, stressing the necessity of a personal hearing and submission of C-Forms for fresh consideration, remanding the matter for a lawful reassessment process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>