<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1000 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333980</link>
    <description>Assessment orders for the relevant years were held to be barred by limitation under the amended limitation provision, because for assessment years up to 1997-98 no valid order could be passed after 30.4.2001. Orders passed in April 2002 were therefore beyond the permissible period and could not be sustained. The first appellate authority&#039;s orders setting aside those assessments were consistent with the settled legal position, and a remand for fresh proceedings was considered unnecessary because the controversy on merits was already covered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1000 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333980</link>
      <description>Assessment orders for the relevant years were held to be barred by limitation under the amended limitation provision, because for assessment years up to 1997-98 no valid order could be passed after 30.4.2001. Orders passed in April 2002 were therefore beyond the permissible period and could not be sustained. The first appellate authority&#039;s orders setting aside those assessments were consistent with the settled legal position, and a remand for fresh proceedings was considered unnecessary because the controversy on merits was already covered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>