https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187638 The Supreme Court upheld the requirement for a Hindu son to prove both the immoral character of the antecedent debt and the alienee's notice of such immorality to challenge an alienation made by his father. Emphasizing the doctrine of pious obligation, the Court affirmed the necessity of sons discharging their father's debts unless they are for immoral purposes. The decision, based on established legal principles and judicial precedents, highlights the burden on sons in property transactions and the importance of protecting bona fide purchasers in Hindu Law. en-us Wed, 04 May 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Oct 2016 11:16:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187638 The Supreme Court upheld the requirement for a Hindu son to prove both the immoral character of the antecedent debt and the alienee's notice of such immorality to challenge an alienation made by his father. Emphasizing the doctrine of pious obligation, the Court affirmed the necessity of sons discharging their father's debts unless they are for immoral purposes. The decision, based on established legal principles and judicial precedents, highlights the burden on sons in property transactions and the importance of protecting bona fide purchasers in Hindu Law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 May 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187638