<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 997 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee successfully discharged the initial burden under Section 68 by providing relevant documents and evidence. The tax authorities failed to substantiate their presumption of accommodation entries with concrete proof. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 96.00 lakhs was deemed unjustified, leading to the allowance of the appeal and the direction to delete the addition by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2016 11:16:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 997 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee successfully discharged the initial burden under Section 68 by providing relevant documents and evidence. The tax authorities failed to substantiate their presumption of accommodation entries with concrete proof. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 96.00 lakhs was deemed unjustified, leading to the allowance of the appeal and the direction to delete the addition by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>