<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 988 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333968</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, deleting the additions made under section 14A read with Rule 8D and the interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, 234C &amp;amp; 234D of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the principle that disallowances under section 14A should be specific to investments and not applicable to shares held as stock-in-trade, as supported by various case laws cited during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2016 11:15:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 988 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333968</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, deleting the additions made under section 14A read with Rule 8D and the interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, 234C &amp;amp; 234D of the Income Tax Act. The decision was based on the principle that disallowances under section 14A should be specific to investments and not applicable to shares held as stock-in-trade, as supported by various case laws cited during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>