https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187632 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that the denial of cenvat credit on Bright Bars as inputs for manufacturing Motor Vehicle Parts was not justified. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant was entitled to the cenvat benefit as the suppliers had paid appropriate duty on the goods, in line with Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. Referring to the judgment in a similar case, the Tribunal concluded that the recipient manufacturer could not be denied the cenvat benefit based on the duty determined by the suppliers' jurisdictional officers. The impugned order was set aside. en-us Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Oct 2016 11:01:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187632 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that the denial of cenvat credit on Bright Bars as inputs for manufacturing Motor Vehicle Parts was not justified. The Tribunal emphasized that the appellant was entitled to the cenvat benefit as the suppliers had paid appropriate duty on the goods, in line with Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. Referring to the judgment in a similar case, the Tribunal concluded that the recipient manufacturer could not be denied the cenvat benefit based on the duty determined by the suppliers' jurisdictional officers. The impugned order was set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187632