<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2558 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187622</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to confirm the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the assessee for unexplained cash deposits in Union Bank of India. Despite the pending appeal before the High Court on the quantum addition, the ITAT found the explanations provided insufficient and dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the failure to justify the cash deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 17:35:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2558 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187622</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to confirm the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the assessee for unexplained cash deposits in Union Bank of India. Despite the pending appeal before the High Court on the quantum addition, the ITAT found the explanations provided insufficient and dismissed the assessee&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the failure to justify the cash deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>