https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187616 Order XXXIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was held applicable in principle to proceedings before the Railway Claims Tribunal where an indigent claimant sought to prosecute a claim and the Act contained no inconsistent procedure. The Tribunal's limited freedom from the Code under Section 18, its duty to follow natural justice, its civil-court powers under Section 18(3), and Rule 44 preserving inherent power supported access to justice. As a result, the Tribunal could not refuse to entertain the claim solely because the prescribed fee could not be paid. en-us Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:16:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187616 Order XXXIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was held applicable in principle to proceedings before the Railway Claims Tribunal where an indigent claimant sought to prosecute a claim and the Act contained no inconsistent procedure. The Tribunal's limited freedom from the Code under Section 18, its duty to follow natural justice, its civil-court powers under Section 18(3), and Rule 44 preserving inherent power supported access to justice. As a result, the Tribunal could not refuse to entertain the claim solely because the prescribed fee could not be paid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187616