<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 979 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333959</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues. The judgment clarified the role of the Commissioner as the competent authority under Section 275(1)(c) and emphasized adherence to the &quot;Departmental View&quot; regarding the initiation of penalty proceedings. The decision provided clarity on conflicting interpretations and highlighted the significance of the Joint Commissioner in initiating penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 979 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333959</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues. The judgment clarified the role of the Commissioner as the competent authority under Section 275(1)(c) and emphasized adherence to the &quot;Departmental View&quot; regarding the initiation of penalty proceedings. The decision provided clarity on conflicting interpretations and highlighted the significance of the Joint Commissioner in initiating penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>