<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 974 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333954</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessing officer&#039;s addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to discrepancies in the identity and existence of shareholders. While a link to an individual was established, the Tribunal deemed the addition in the assessee companies&#039; hands as leading to double taxation, emphasizing the need to prove shareholders&#039; authenticity. The Tribunal rejected arguments regarding the assessment of the individual&#039;s income and ruled in favor of maintaining the addition under section 68, highlighting the assessee&#039;s burden to substantiate the legitimacy of share transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:12:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 974 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333954</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessing officer&#039;s addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to discrepancies in the identity and existence of shareholders. While a link to an individual was established, the Tribunal deemed the addition in the assessee companies&#039; hands as leading to double taxation, emphasizing the need to prove shareholders&#039; authenticity. The Tribunal rejected arguments regarding the assessment of the individual&#039;s income and ruled in favor of maintaining the addition under section 68, highlighting the assessee&#039;s burden to substantiate the legitimacy of share transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>