<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 973 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333953</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the interpretation of Section 54-F, consideration of evidence for adjustments, taxability of capital gains, and treatment of investments outside the Capital Gains Scheme. The Court found no sale deed presented to claim capital gains, leading to the conclusion that there was no sale of the property in question, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:12:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 973 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333953</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision on the interpretation of Section 54-F, consideration of evidence for adjustments, taxability of capital gains, and treatment of investments outside the Capital Gains Scheme. The Court found no sale deed presented to claim capital gains, leading to the conclusion that there was no sale of the property in question, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>