<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 972 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333952</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 was not justified as the AO could not revisit the issue of additional depreciation in the absence of incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order and concluded that the proceedings under Section 263 were invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:12:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 972 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333952</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 was not justified as the AO could not revisit the issue of additional depreciation in the absence of incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal quashed the CIT&#039;s order and concluded that the proceedings under Section 263 were invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>