<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (12) TMI 41 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187609</link>
    <description>A confession can be relied on only when voluntariness is satisfactorily proved; prompt retraction, possible police influence during remand, and unresolved doubts about coercion may render it unsafe to use. The commentary also explains that an appeal against acquittal permits full reappreciation of the evidence, and the phrase &quot;compelling reasons&quot; is not an independent fetter on that power. In special leave jurisdiction under Article 136, the Supreme Court will not interfere merely because another view of the facts is possible. The remaining circumstantial evidence, including motive and recovery, was treated as sufficient to sustain conviction on the record discussed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:05:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (12) TMI 41 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187609</link>
      <description>A confession can be relied on only when voluntariness is satisfactorily proved; prompt retraction, possible police influence during remand, and unresolved doubts about coercion may render it unsafe to use. The commentary also explains that an appeal against acquittal permits full reappreciation of the evidence, and the phrase &quot;compelling reasons&quot; is not an independent fetter on that power. In special leave jurisdiction under Article 136, the Supreme Court will not interfere merely because another view of the facts is possible. The remaining circumstantial evidence, including motive and recovery, was treated as sufficient to sustain conviction on the record discussed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187609</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>