https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333940 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi allowed the appeal, remanding the case for verification of Cenvat Credit disallowed due to invoices not in the appellant's name. The appellant, part of G.E. India Industrial Pvt. Ltd., demonstrated invoice genuineness and provided required documentation. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to Rule 9(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004, citing previous decisions. The penalty under section 77 of the Finance Act 1994 was vacated. The case outcome focused on ensuring genuine Cenvat Credit claims are not unjustly denied, emphasizing verification and legal compliance. en-us Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Sep 2017 15:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333940 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi allowed the appeal, remanding the case for verification of Cenvat Credit disallowed due to invoices not in the appellant's name. The appellant, part of G.E. India Industrial Pvt. Ltd., demonstrated invoice genuineness and provided required documentation. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to Rule 9(2) of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004, citing previous decisions. The penalty under section 77 of the Finance Act 1994 was vacated. The case outcome focused on ensuring genuine Cenvat Credit claims are not unjustly denied, emphasizing verification and legal compliance. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 16 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333940