https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333938 The Tribunal determined that the appellant's service qualified as a "Franchise Service" for Service Tax purposes, requiring further review of the tax calculation. The penalty under Section 78 was waived due to reasonable cause for delayed payment. The case was remanded for a fresh assessment of the Service Tax quantification, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice. en-us Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333938 The Tribunal determined that the appellant's service qualified as a "Franchise Service" for Service Tax purposes, requiring further review of the tax calculation. The penalty under Section 78 was waived due to reasonable cause for delayed payment. The case was remanded for a fresh assessment of the Service Tax quantification, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 09 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333938