<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (11) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5538</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing both extra depreciation and extra shift depreciation allowance for approved hotels. The Court held that depreciation is based on machinery and plant, not the nature of the activity, and approved hotels are eligible for both allowances. The judgment overturned the High Court decision, emphasizing that the concept of shift applies even in a hotel setting, making them eligible for extra shift depreciation allowance. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (11) TMI 1 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5538</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing both extra depreciation and extra shift depreciation allowance for approved hotels. The Court held that depreciation is based on machinery and plant, not the nature of the activity, and approved hotels are eligible for both allowances. The judgment overturned the High Court decision, emphasizing that the concept of shift applies even in a hotel setting, making them eligible for extra shift depreciation allowance. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>