<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 953 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333933</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 11A due to the payment of disputed Cenvat credits and interest, and the absence of fraudulent intentions or suppression.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 11:50:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 953 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333933</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 11A due to the payment of disputed Cenvat credits and interest, and the absence of fraudulent intentions or suppression.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>