https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333930 The Hon'ble Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving disputes over the classification and valuation of Ayurvedic Medicaments (Pain Balm) under Chapter 30 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting the refund claimed by the appellants for specified periods without requiring the test of unjust enrichment, emphasizing the importance of evidence in establishing duty non-transfer during provisional assessments. en-us Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Oct 2016 11:50:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333930 The Hon'ble Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving disputes over the classification and valuation of Ayurvedic Medicaments (Pain Balm) under Chapter 30 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order and granting the refund claimed by the appellants for specified periods without requiring the test of unjust enrichment, emphasizing the importance of evidence in establishing duty non-transfer during provisional assessments. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333930