<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 949 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333929</link>
    <description>Packaged cement supplied under a contract with a declared retail sale price remained eligible for concessional duty under the exemption notification. The transaction price was treated as the maximum sale price and corresponded to the retail sale price, so the benefit could not be denied merely because the buyer was an industrial consumer. The proviso invoked by Revenue applied only where declaration of retail sale price was not required and had not been made. The commentary follows the Tribunal&#039;s earlier view that refund sanction was proper on these facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 949 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333929</link>
      <description>Packaged cement supplied under a contract with a declared retail sale price remained eligible for concessional duty under the exemption notification. The transaction price was treated as the maximum sale price and corresponded to the retail sale price, so the benefit could not be denied merely because the buyer was an industrial consumer. The proviso invoked by Revenue applied only where declaration of retail sale price was not required and had not been made. The commentary follows the Tribunal&#039;s earlier view that refund sanction was proper on these facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>