https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333927 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the appeal due to the Appellant's non-appearance during hearings, allegations of clandestine clearance of goods without proper documentation, reliance on incriminating statements, rejection of cross-examination plea, and citation of legal precedents by the Respondent. The Tribunal found the Appellant involved in the wrongdoing based on evidence presented, leading to the conclusion that the Appellant engaged in clandestine activities without maintaining proper records or paying central excise duty. en-us Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:23:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333927 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the appeal due to the Appellant's non-appearance during hearings, allegations of clandestine clearance of goods without proper documentation, reliance on incriminating statements, rejection of cross-examination plea, and citation of legal precedents by the Respondent. The Tribunal found the Appellant involved in the wrongdoing based on evidence presented, leading to the conclusion that the Appellant engaged in clandestine activities without maintaining proper records or paying central excise duty. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 23 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=333927