https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187599 Temple inams granted to hereditary office-holders as remuneration for religious services were treated as grants of both melwaram and kudiwaram, not merely melwaram, on the basis of title deeds, inam register entries, and contemporaneous statements. The inams fell within section 44-B because they were service inams attached to temple duties, not merely personal inams burdened with service. Section 44-B(2) was construed to permit resumption where the relevant alienation or lease pre-dated the provision, and the right of resumption was not defeated by adverse possession because the occupiers held as lessees under the inamdars, not adversely. en-us Tue, 26 Mar 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:34:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187599 Temple inams granted to hereditary office-holders as remuneration for religious services were treated as grants of both melwaram and kudiwaram, not merely melwaram, on the basis of title deeds, inam register entries, and contemporaneous statements. The inams fell within section 44-B because they were service inams attached to temple duties, not merely personal inams burdened with service. Section 44-B(2) was construed to permit resumption where the relevant alienation or lease pre-dated the provision, and the right of resumption was not defeated by adverse possession because the occupiers held as lessees under the inamdars, not adversely. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 26 Mar 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=187599