<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs Case: Deponent&#039;s Agreement on Fabric Composition Insufficient for Classification of Previous Consignments.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31878</link>
    <description>Classification of fabric - Merely because the deponent of the statement has agreed before the Customs that the previous consignment may be of the same composition, by itself does not establish that the previous consignments were admittedly of the same composition. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:45:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:45:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=446181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs Case: Deponent&#039;s Agreement on Fabric Composition Insufficient for Classification of Previous Consignments.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31878</link>
      <description>Classification of fabric - Merely because the deponent of the statement has agreed before the Customs that the previous consignment may be of the same composition, by itself does not establish that the previous consignments were admittedly of the same composition. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2016 09:45:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=31878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>